Controversy and complementarity in mechanistic organic chemistry. The transition state and structural theories reexamined

Sosale, Chandrasekhar (1998) Controversy and complementarity in mechanistic organic chemistry. The transition state and structural theories reexamined. In: Research on Chemical Intermediates, 24 (6). pp. 625-642.

PDF fulltext.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (993kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

It is proposed that molecular phenomena may only be described within the framework of the Complementarity Principle ('CP'), and that scientific controversy may originate in the essential incompatibility of complementary representations. Complementarity based on the temporal Uncertainty Principle leads to new insights into transition state theory, microscopic reversibility and the Curtin-Hammett Principle. An empirical application of the 'CP' to the structural theory leads to a revision of present concepts of 'reaction dynamics', with the Principle of Least Nuclear Motion ('PLNM') emerging as a general alternative to electronic theories of reactivity. In fact, it is argued that the 'PLNM' is a better basis for the Woodward-Hoffmann rules than is orbital symmetry. A more flexible approach to organic reaction mechanisms is thus indicated. Also, as the basis of the structural theory is fundamentally uncertain, and the present theory of X-ray diffraction apparently incompatible with the 'UP', a reinterpretation of the Bragg equation has been attempted.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Publication:	Research on Chemical Intermediates
Publisher:	VSP
Additional Information:	Copyright of this article belongs to VSP.
Department/Centre:	Division of Chemical Sciences > Organic Chemistry
Date Deposited:	18 May 2009 05:22
Last Modified:	19 Sep 2010 05:01
URI:	http://eprints.iisc.ac.in/id/eprint/18321

Actions (login required)

View Item