ePrints@IIScePrints@IISc Home | About | Browse | Latest Additions | Advanced Search | Contact | Help

The Impact of Using Co-Compost on Resource Management and Resilience of Smallholder Agriculture in South India

Fendel, V and Kranert, M and Maurer, C and Garcés-Sánchez, G and Huang, J and Ramakrishna, G (2022) The Impact of Using Co-Compost on Resource Management and Resilience of Smallholder Agriculture in South India. In: Environments - MDPI, 9 (11).

[img]
Preview
PDF
env_mdp_9-11_2022.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9110143

Abstract

Agriculture is the main source of income in India, with most farmers being smallholders and facing multiple challenges, such as climate change and land degradation. For the sustainable implementation of alternative circular approaches, it is important that agriculture benefits. To assess this, the impact of using co-compost (organic waste and black water consisting of feces and urine) was evaluated through surveys of 120 smallholder farmers in two case studies in South India. All 149 questions related to the overarching research question: what is the impact of using co-compost on closing loops in smallholder agriculture in terms of resource management and resilience. Secondary smallholder resources were found to be well managed and local networks and economies proved to be particularly effective in pandemics, reinforcing the potential for nutrient sources from urban areas. For most farmers, using co-compost improved yields (90%), soil (80%), plant health (93%) and, consequently, profits (67%), as well as water management (53%). Water management was significantly less of a problem for co-compost users (15%) than non-users (42%). In addition, the users of co-compost were able to save resources. Chemical fertilizer use was significantly reduced from 1.42 ± 2.1 to 0.9 ± 1.35 t (acre∙year)−1, with total savings ranging from 37 to 44%. Overall, 67% were able to reduce chemical fertilizer use and 25% were able to reduce chemical spray use. Additionally, 53% reduced water consumption by 30.3% ± 19.92%. The visible benefits could motivate others to try co-composting. The reservations of non-users were due to personal or societal aspects (25%). In addition, the desire of farmers to convert to organic farming and try alternative farming methods, such as using smart technologies, vermicomposting or co-compost, was high (43%) and was positively influenced by the profitable use of alternative circular concepts. Information dissemination was mainly promoted by advertising (60%) and demonstrations (27%), which influenced openness to alternative circular concepts and products. In conclusion, co-composting and co-recycling approaches have a positive impact on the resource management and resilience of smallholder agriculture and thus, contribute to achieving sustainability goals. © 2022 by the authors.

Item Type: Journal Article
Publication: Environments - MDPI
Publisher: MDPI
Additional Information: The copyright for this article belongs to the Authors.
Keywords: co-compost; co-recycling concepts; farmer perspectives; resilience; resource management; smallholder agriculture; South India; sustainable development goals
Department/Centre: Division of Mechanical Sciences > Divecha Centre for Climate Change
Date Deposited: 28 Mar 2023 09:11
Last Modified: 28 Mar 2023 09:11
URI: https://eprints.iisc.ac.in/id/eprint/81190

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item