Govinda, S and Kore, BP and Swain, D and Hossain, A and De, C and Guru Row, TN and Sarma, DD (2018) Critical Comparison of FAPbX3 and MAPbX3 (X = Br and Cl): How Do They Differ? In: Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 122 (25). pp. 13758-13766.
PDF
jou_phy_che_C_122-25_13758-13766_2018.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Dielectric measurements on formamidinium lead halide perovskites, FAPbCl3 and FAPbBr3, compared to those of MAPbCl3 and previously reported MAPbBr3, reveal the strongly suppressed temperature dependence of dielectric constants in FA compounds in the temperature range of approximately 140-300 K. Although the behavior of dielectric constants of FA compounds for temperatures <140 K resembles that of the MAPbX3 system, the absence of any strong temperature dependence in sharp contrast to MA analogues in the higher temperature range up to room temperature suggests that the formamidinium (FA) dipoles are in a deep-frozen glassy state unlike the MA dipoles that rotate nearly freely in the temperature range relevant for any photovoltaic application. This observation is further supported by the temperature-dependent single-crystal X-ray diffraction (XRD) results.
Item Type: | Journal Article |
---|---|
Publication: | Journal of Physical Chemistry C |
Publisher: | American Chemical Society |
Additional Information: | The copyright for this article belongs to the American Chemical Society. |
Keywords: | Lead compounds; Perovskite; Photovoltaic effects; Single crystals; Temperature distribution, Dielectric measurements; Halide perovskites; Photovoltaic applications; Sharp contrast; Single crystal x-ray diffraction; Temperature dependence; Temperature dependent; Temperature range, Bromine |
Department/Centre: | Division of Chemical Sciences > Solid State & Structural Chemistry Unit |
Date Deposited: | 11 Aug 2022 09:01 |
Last Modified: | 11 Aug 2022 09:01 |
URI: | https://eprints.iisc.ac.in/id/eprint/75498 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |