Comparative Study of Transcriptomics-Based Scoring Metrics for the Epithelial-Hybrid-Mesenchymal Spectrum

Chakraborty, P and George, JT and Tripathi, S and Levine, H and Jolly, MK (2020) Comparative Study of Transcriptomics-Based Scoring Metrics for the Epithelial-Hybrid-Mesenchymal Spectrum. In: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8 .

Preview	PDF fro_bio_bio_08_2020.pdf - Published Version Download (5MB) | Preview
	Archive (ZIP) 4902543.zip - Published Supplemental Material Download (960kB)

Abstract

The Epithelial�mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a cellular process implicated in embryonic development, wound healing, and pathological conditions such as cancer metastasis and fibrosis. Cancer cells undergoing EMT exhibit enhanced aggressive behavior characterized by drug resistance, tumor-initiation potential, and the ability to evade the immune system. Recent in silico, in vitro, and in vivo evidence indicates that EMT is not an all-or-none process; instead, cells can stably acquire one or more hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal (E/M) phenotypes which often can be more aggressive than purely E or M cell populations. Thus, the EMT status of cancer cells can prove to be a critical estimate of patient prognosis. Recent attempts have employed different transcriptomics signatures to quantify EMT status in cell lines and patient tumors. However, a comprehensive comparison of these methods, including their accuracy in identifying cells in the hybrid E/M phenotype(s), is lacking. Here, we compare three distinct metrics that score EMT on a continuum, based on the transcriptomics signature of individual samples. Our results demonstrate that these methods exhibit good concordance among themselves in quantifying the extent of EMT in a given sample. Moreover, scoring EMT using any of the three methods discerned that cells can undergo varying extents of EMT across tumor types. Separately, our analysis also identified tumor types with maximum variability in terms of EMT and associated an enrichment of hybrid E/M signatures in these samples. Moreover, we also found that the multinomial logistic regression (MLR)-based metric was capable of distinguishing between �pure� individual hybrid E/M vs. mixtures of E and M cells. Our results, thus, suggest that while any of the three methods can indicate a generic trend in the EMT status of a given cell, the MLR method has two additional advantages: (a) it uses a small number of predictors to calculate the EMT score and (b) it can predict from the transcriptomic signature of a population whether it is comprised of �pure� hybrid E/M cells at the single-cell level or is instead an ensemble of E and M cell subpopulations.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Publication:	Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Publisher:	FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Additional Information:	The copyright of this article belongs to FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
Keywords:	Cell culture; Cell proliferation; Diagnosis; Diseases; Logistic regression; Tumors, Cancer metastasis; Comparative studies; Comprehensive comparisons; Embryonic development; Multinomial logistic regression; Pathological conditions; Patient prognosis; Single-cell level, Cells
Department/Centre:	Division of Interdisciplinary Sciences > Centre for Biosystems Science and Engineering
Date Deposited:	18 Jun 2020 10:21
Last Modified:	18 Jun 2020 10:21
URI:	http://eprints.iisc.ac.in/id/eprint/65171

Actions (login required)

View Item