Harbola, Upendra and Agarwalla, Bijay Kumar and Mukamel, Shaul (2015) Response to ``Comment on `Frequency-domain stimulated and spontaneous light emission signals at molecular junctions''' J. Chem. Phys. 142, 137101 (2015)]. In: JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 142 (13).
PDF
jou_che_phy-142_13_2015.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (489kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
In a recent work [U. Harbola, B. K. Agrawalla, and S. Mukamel, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 074107 (2014)], we have presented a superoperator (Liouville space) diagrammatic formulation of spontaneous and stimulated optical signals from current-carrying molecular junctions. We computed the diagrams that contribute to the spontaneous light emission SLE (fluorescence and Raman) signal using a diagrammatic method which clearly distinguishes between the Raman and the fluorescence contributions. We pointed out some discrepancies with the work of Galperin, Ratner and Nitzan (GRN) [M. Galperin, M. A. Ratner and, A. Nitzan, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 144109 (2009)]. In their response [M. Galperin, M. A. Ratner and A. Nitzan, “Comment on‘ Frequency-domain stimulated and spontaneous light emission signals at molecular junctions’” [J. Chem. Phys. 141, 074107 (2014)], J. Chem. Phys. 142, 137101 (2015)] to our work, GRN have argued that there are no differences in the choice of Raman diagrams in both works. Here we reply to their points and show where the differences exist.
Item Type: | Journal Article |
---|---|
Publication: | JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS |
Publisher: | AMER INST PHYSICS |
Additional Information: | Copy right for this article belongs to the AMER INST PHYSICS, 1305 WALT WHITMAN RD, STE 300, MELVILLE, NY 11747-4501 USA |
Department/Centre: | Division of Chemical Sciences > Inorganic & Physical Chemistry |
Date Deposited: | 13 May 2015 07:01 |
Last Modified: | 13 May 2015 07:01 |
URI: | http://eprints.iisc.ac.in/id/eprint/51515 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |