Performance evaluation of AR4 Climate Models in simulating daily precipitation over the Indian region using skill scores

Anandhi, Aavudai and Nanjundiah, Ravi S (2015) Performance evaluation of AR4 Climate Models in simulating daily precipitation over the Indian region using skill scores. In: THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 119 (3-4). pp. 551-566.

PDF the_app_cli_119-3_551_2015.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The ability of Coupled General Circulation Models (CGCMs) participating in the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change's fourth assessment report (IPCC AR4) for the 20th century climate (20C3M scenario) to simulate the daily precipitation over the Indian region is explored. The skill is evaluated on a 2.5A degrees x 2.5A degrees grid square compared with the Indian Meteorological Department's (IMD) gridded dataset, and every GCM is ranked for each of these grids based on its skill score. Skill scores (SSs) are estimated from the probability density functions (PDFs) obtained from observed IMD datasets and GCM simulations. The methodology takes into account (high) extreme precipitation events simulated by GCMs. The results are analyzed and presented for three categories and six zones. The three categories are the monsoon season (JJASO - June to October), non-monsoon season (JFMAMND - January to May, November, December) and for the entire year (''Annual''). The six precipitation zones are peninsular, west central, northwest, northeast, central northeast India, and the hilly region. Sensitivity analysis was performed for three spatial scales, 2.5A degrees grid square, zones, and all of India, in the three categories. The models were ranked based on the SS. The category JFMAMND had a higher SS than the JJASO category. The northwest zone had higher SSs, whereas the peninsular and hilly regions had lower SS. No single GCM can be identified as the best for all categories and zones. Some models consistently outperformed the model ensemble, and one model had particularly poor performance. Results show that most models underestimated the daily precipitation rates in the 0-1 mm/day range and overestimated it in the 1-15 mm/day range.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Publication:	THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
Publisher:	SPRINGER WIEN
Additional Information:	Copy right for this article belongs to the SPRINGER WIEN, SACHSENPLATZ 4-6, PO BOX 89, A-1201 WIEN, AUSTRIA
Department/Centre:	Division of Mechanical Sciences > Centre for Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences
Date Deposited:	19 Mar 2015 12:08
Last Modified:	19 Mar 2015 12:08
URI:	http://eprints.iisc.ac.in/id/eprint/51045

Actions (login required)

View Item