Soni, PM and Chockalingam, A (2002) Performance analysis of UDP with energy efficient link layer on Markov fading channels. In: IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Oct 2002, Kanpur, India.
![]() |
PDF
Performance.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (712kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the throughput and energy efficiency performance of user datagram protocol (UDP) using linear, binary exponential, and geometric backoff algorithms at the link layer (LL) on point-to-point wireless fading links. Using a first-order Markov chain representation of the packet success/failure process on fading channels, we derive analytical expressions for throughput and energy efficiency of UDP/LL with and without LL backoff. The analytical results are verified through simulations. We also evaluate the mean delay and delay variation of voice packets and energy efficiency performance over a wireless link that uses UDP for transport of voice packets and the proposed backoff algorithms at the LL. We show that the proposed LL backoff algorithms achieve energy efficiency improvement of the order of 2-3 dB compared to LL with no backoff, without compromising much on the throughput and delay performance at the UDP layer. Such energy savings through protocol means will improve the battery life in wireless mobile terminals.
Item Type: | Conference Paper |
---|---|
Publisher: | IEEE |
Additional Information: | Copyright 2002 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted.However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE. |
Department/Centre: | Division of Electrical Sciences > Electrical Communication Engineering |
Date Deposited: | 16 Mar 2012 12:14 |
Last Modified: | 16 Mar 2012 12:14 |
URI: | http://eprints.iisc.ac.in/id/eprint/43940 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |